Brand & UGC

Face-Cam or No-Face: How to Choose the Right UGC Format for Your Brand

Practical guide — Laura Sireta

If you're putting together a UGC brief for your brand, there's one question that rarely gets asked out loud but changes everything: should the creator appear on camera? The answer depends on your product, your budget and the goal of the video. Here's how to get it right.

What a face on camera really changes

Face-cam content builds trust almost instantly: you see a real person react, speak, recommend. That's why this format tends to convert better once placed in paid ads — audiences find it easier to project their own experience onto a recognisable person.

No-face content (hands, unboxing, product shots, voiceover) relies on something else: clarity of movement, quality of staging, and it often showcases the product itself better, without a face "stealing" attention from the thing you're actually trying to sell.

When to go with no-face

When to go with face-cam

The smartest move: test both

In practice, the brands that get the best results don't commit to one side permanently. They test a no-face format to quickly validate an angle or message, then invest in a scripted face-cam version once that angle is confirmed — to push it in paid ads with a bigger budget behind it.

Since a no-face test costs less, it's often the most sensible entry point before committing to a bigger, more scripted production budget.

What to specify in your brief, whichever format you choose

Got a brief to send over?

I deliver both formats — face-cam and no-face — with photos included, ready to run within 3 to 5 days.

Discuss my brief